Shape Before Recency: Longitudinal Precedent Retrieval in Conformation-Bound Decision Systems

Proposed arXiv categories: cs.IR / cs.AI Publication DAG node: P02, Wave A Dependencies: the frozen parent foundation only Claim register: P02-C1, P02-C2, P02-C3, P02-C4

Recency should determine whether a precedent remains current, not whether it is structurally the right precedent. Precedent standing is a terrain-shaped relation with hard vetoes, not a timestamp-weighted vector score.

We contribute a retrieval order, a typed precedent object, a longitudinal trajectory representation, and a benchmark that separates recurrence from currentness. The proposal is intentionally neither `ignore time'' nor `replace embeddings.'' Embeddings and timestamps remain useful lower-order instruments. They are subordinated to conformation: a precedent must match the current problem's causal and authority shape before recency is allowed to reweight it.

FORKED is an internally owned and managed estate inside the Ubiquity Federation, Prompted LLC's flagship governance substrate. The estate inherits the Fractal Quivers of Quivers parent topology, production splat mechanics, center exclusion, receipt-bearing lawful traversal, lifecycle separation, and the rule that models propose morphisms while governance determines admissible motion [@Taylor2026FQoQ; @Taylor2026OpenCenter; @Prompted2026Ubiquity]. This paper studies one bounded expression of that parent architecture. It neither renames the parent substrate nor inherits universal applicability from it.

The evidence lanes are kept separate. A canonical or source artifact establishes what that artifact states. A component test establishes behavior under its recorded configuration. A synthetic campaign establishes behavior of the generator and analysis pipeline, not human, hardware, customer, field, or operational performance. Novel cross-domain claims are preregistered as hypotheses and remain open to null, adverse, localized, and disproving results.

Dependency freeze. No paper dependencies.

The interlattice is the citation and governance relationship among the parent FQoQ topology, production splat mechanics, the FORKED foundational architecture, the Native Range, the Experimental Program, and the companion papers in this DAG. Citations are therefore typed: a parent citation supplies inherited architecture; a native citation supplies component behavior; a synthetic citation supplies generator-level evidence; a companion citation supplies a versioned specialized argument. No downstream citation converts an upstream hypothesis into a universal fact.

This paper's claims are:

Modern AI systems frequently compress unlike objects into a common output surface. Facts, hypotheses, instructions, permissions, model predictions, runtime observations, and institutional decisions can all arrive as fluent text or a single status field. The resulting failure is architectural before it is linguistic: a local representation acquires authority that its source never possessed. Recency should determine whether a precedent remains current, not whether it is structurally the right precedent. Precedent standing is a terrain-shaped relation with hard vetoes, not a timestamp-weighted vector score.

Past failures should influence present decisions when their structure conforms to the present terrain. They should not dominate merely because they are recent, emotionally vivid, institutionally notorious, or easy to name.

FORKED separates two variables:

A failure can be salient and irrelevant. Another can be old and structurally load-bearing. The architecture therefore retrieves precedents through a staged gate:

The internal terrain lineage contains a direct example of why this matters. A lexical retrieval matched the word used to describe a problem and selected the wrong doctrine. A six-ray shape strike with an APO veto selected the correct governing pattern instead. The resulting principle is explicit: rehydration is shape- and field-derived, not keyword-derived. [@TerrainDoctrine2026; @Taylor2026OpenCenter]

A generic scoring form is:

V_APO is a veto, not a low weight. Currentness is bounded. The architecture may increase or decrease a candidate's standing because the world changed, but recency cannot independently manufacture conformation.

The native terrain campaign makes this policy executable: an older shape-conforming precedent outranked a recent shape-distant precedent in all 500 generated trials. That is a receipt of the current implementation, not a universal theorem about all memory systems. [@ForkedCampaign2026]

Recency still matters. A physically identical failure may no longer be relevant because the mechanism was replaced, the jurisdiction changed, the authority expired, or the environment moved outside the original envelope. FORKED therefore treats time as one of several typed constraints rather than as a universal decay function.

Three temporal questions are kept separate:

A recent record can describe an old event. A late observation can correct a state that was already acted upon. A canonical rule may remain valid while the loaded runtime uses older bytes. A memory may be old but still current if the governed mechanism has not changed. The architecture therefore stores source-time, observation-time, receipt-time, valid-time, transaction-time, expiry, and reopen triggers as separate fields where the domain requires them.

The temporal discipline is adjacent to bitemporal databases and distributed-systems clocks. Lamport showed that event ordering in distributed systems cannot be reduced to one global physical clock, while bitemporal databases distinguish when a fact is valid in the represented world from when it is stored in the database. [@Lamport1978Time; @Mattern1989VirtualTime; @Snodgrass1999Temporal] FORKED adds authority and source-tense: the fact that a record entered the system at transaction time does not establish that the recording actor had standing to crown it.

Temporal conformation changes mechanics. A stale source may trigger a fuse. A claim near expiry may require refresh. A delayed sensor stream may remain useful for historical reconstruction but lose standing for a current declaration. A correction that arrives after action must traverse the dependent graph rather than merely update the source row.

Content classifiers inspect a sentence, image, or state. Many dangerous or valuable patterns exist only across motion.

Hubris is not one confident sentence. It is a sequence in which local success increases scope, scope acquires prestige, prestige suppresses contradiction, contradiction is reclassified as friction, and the system approaches a surface where correction becomes expensive. Trauma-driven non-closure is also a trajectory: a prior false alarm increases caution, caution becomes default suspicion, strong evidence arrives, declaration remains withheld, and delay becomes irreversible.

FORKED represents a longitudinal state as a quiver, not a scalar trend line. Each observation is a splat with its own receipts and source-tense. Edges express persistence, correction, recurrence, mutation, and phase transition. Working derivatives may summarize movement:

The first difference indicates direction. The second indicates curvature. Neither is sovereign. A sudden change can be evidence of a real phase transition or a sensor artifact. The trajectory object retains the receipts that would distinguish them.

Trajectory also supports prospective pressure. A current path can be projected toward a likely irreversible surface without claiming that the future is fixed. The projection changes inspection cost and review cadence. It does not authorize the state it predicts.

A precedent m is represented as a splat and trajectory quiver rather than a single embedding. Its standing for query q is \[ \operatorname{Stand}(m\mid q)=\mathbf{1}[\Omega_q\cap P_m=\varnothing]\;\Phi(S_q,S_m,\tau_q,\tau_m,H_q,H_m,A_q,A_m)\;C(m,q), \] where the indicator is the apophatic veto, Φ is a structured conformation function over facet topology, trajectory phase, horizon and authority geometry, and C is a bounded currentness modifier. We require C to be monotone in relevant mechanism drift, not simply wall-clock age. A recent precedent with an expired authority, changed physical mechanism, or different point-of-no-return surface can therefore receive low standing. An old precedent with stable physics and close topology can remain live.

The representation distinguishes memory salience from precedent authority. Salience determines what is easy to retrieve. Standing determines what may shape action. This separation is important after salient failures: a system can remain appropriately sensitive to the remembered harm without letting the event veto every superficially similar future decision.

The benchmark contains five paired families. In shape-versus-recency pairs, the old item is causally isomorphic and the recent item shares vocabulary but not topology. In currentness-reversal pairs, the old shape match depends on a mechanism, law, actor, interface, or physical condition that has changed. In authority pairs, an otherwise close precedent was decided by an actor without current standing. In trajectory-phase pairs, cases share endpoints but differ in whether the system is entering, normalizing, capturing, rupturing, or correcting. In PONR pairs, the same failure shape appears at materially different distances from irreversible action or delay.

Baselines include BM25, dense embedding retrieval, time-decayed embedding retrieval, temporal knowledge-graph retrieval, graph-only retrieval, and the proposed ordered pipeline. The query and corpus are paraphrased independently to prevent surface matching from solving the task. Human adjudicators label the governing precedent and the reasons for exclusion before model evaluation. The label protocol permits no precedent has lawful standing.

The native terrain campaign ran 500 paired generated cases; the older stronger shape match ranked above the recent weaker match in every case [@ForkedCampaign2026]. The result is exact evidence that the encoded scoring policy works as intended. It does not establish that the feature representation, weights, or synthetic distribution match real institutional memory. An earlier internal rehydration event also documented a lexical grep selecting the wrong doctrine while a six-ray shape read with an APO veto selected the intended lane; that receipt motivates, but does not independently validate, the benchmark [@Taylor2026OpenCenter].

The paper treats this evidence directly where capability is established and narrowly where it is not. Implemented code paths are called implemented. Passing component tests are called passing component tests. Synthetic estimates remain synthetic. Human and field effects remain hypotheses until their own evidence exists.

The formal preregistration artifact distributed with this paper freezes the primary claims, outcomes, controls, exclusion rules, analysis family, null interpretation, and release boundary before external data collection. The core sequence is:

Accuracy is reported separately for recurrence-dominant and currentness-dominant families. We preregister no single overall score because a system can look strong by always choosing old shape matches or always choosing recent sources. Calibration is evaluated for the probability assigned to the selected precedent and for the probability of none. Decision-level evaluation measures whether the retrieved precedent improves the subsequent lawful-traversal judgment. Error analysis classifies lexical lure, shape lure, stale mechanism, authority laundering, phase confusion, and horizon leakage.

If a simple time-decayed embedding matches the ordered pipeline, the shape-first architecture is not promoted for that corpus. If the pipeline wins only on author-designed ontologies, the claim is localized. If currentness errors rise, the recency cap is treated as underfit rather than defended as a principle. Missing labels and adjudicator disagreement remain an explicit unresolved set.

Terrain shape depends on a representation that can encode the architect's blind spots. Historical records often omit authority, alternatives, and failed corrections. The method cannot reconstruct absent receipts by mathematical elegance. It must preserve an unknown lane and price the risk of hidden state.

This public paper is limited to benign assurance, provenance, human-agency preservation, lawful state transition, simulation, test infrastructure, and defensive resilience. It does not disclose operational target-selection logic, engagement optimization, platform-specific exploitation thresholds, live deception procedures, signature-emitter recipes, or methods that materially increase harmful capability. Any later operational research requires separate lawful authority, ethics and safety review, configuration control, and release adjudication.

Recency should determine whether a precedent remains current, not whether it is structurally the right precedent. Precedent standing is a terrain-shaped relation with hard vetoes, not a timestamp-weighted vector score. The contribution is not a claim that every domain should adopt one representation, threshold, interface, or governance stack. It is a falsifiable architecture and experiment package for determining where this mechanism carries load, where it inverts, and where a simpler system should win.

The submission bundle includes the manuscript source, compiled PDF, bibliography, preregistration, claim register, controls and null-handling document, release boundary, source manifest, configuration digest, dependency contract, figure source, and arXiv source archive. Internal source artifacts are cited by immutable digest where available. Restricted operational material is not included.

Breyden E. Taylor is the author and bears responsibility for the thesis, terminology, claims, boundaries, and decision to publish. Homeskillet assisted with source synthesis, drafting, artifact generation, typesetting, and build inspection. The Ubiquity Federation supplied prior artifacts, runtime implementations, and receipts. AI assistance is production history, not evidence.