# P05 Preregistration

## Title

Fable Terrain: Controlled Narrative Priors with Matched Plain-Language and Adverse-Frame Controls

## Claims

- `P05-C1`
- `P05-C2`
- `P05-C3`
- `P05-C4`

## Dependencies

P02, P03

## Primary outcomes

- Observer accounting
- Authority recognition
- Source inspection
- False analogy
- Overcaution
- Decision time
- Correction quality
- Recall of frame and underlying topology

## Controls

- Matched plain-language constraints
- Proper-noun ablation
- Neutral metaphor
- Misleading topology frame
- No frame
- Familiarity and culture strata
- Length/severity/valence matching
- Generic caution scale

## Analysis plan

We test named-fable versus matched-language and ablated-fable versus matched-language contrasts separately. A generic caution mediator is included to determine whether any benefit is explained by slowing down. False analogy and overcaution are co-primary adverse outcomes. Bayesian multilevel models estimate heterogeneity across fables and cultural strata; no pooled narrative effect is interpreted as universal. We also compare the structural similarity between each participant's explanation and the preregistered topology rather than relying on moral recall alone.

## Null handling

If named and ablated fables do not outperform matched language, the mechanism is not attributed to fable compression. If only familiar participants benefit, the claim is localized. If misleading frames produce harms comparable to benefits, no deployment recommendation follows. A memorable but causally irrelevant explanation counts as false analogy, not insight.

## Falsifiers

- Effects reduce to reading time or severity
- Proper-noun ablation removes all benefit
- Matched plain language performs equally
- Misleading-frame harm dominates
- Cultural heterogeneity makes a shared field untenable

## Release boundary

This public paper is limited to benign assurance, provenance, human-agency preservation, lawful state transition, simulation, test infrastructure, and defensive resilience. It does not disclose operational target-selection logic, engagement optimization, platform-specific exploitation thresholds, live deception procedures, signature-emitter recipes, or methods that materially increase harmful capability. Any later operational research requires separate lawful authority, ethics and safety review, configuration control, and release adjudication.

## Deviations

Any deviation from the frozen design must be timestamped, justified, and separated into an exploratory analysis. No favorable result may retroactively alter the primary gate.