{ "$schema": "https://promptedllc.com/forked-arxiv-program.schema.json", "schema": "prompted.forked.arxiv-program.v1", "version": "1.0", "updated": "2026-08-21", "purpose": "Public release schedule for the twelve-paper FORKED arXiv publication DAG. This file is the single source of truth for wave order, freeze dates, submission windows, lifecycle status, dependency edges, claim registers, and artifact hashes. The human lane at /forked/arxiv and the Architect schedule lane both read it; nothing else hardcodes the program.", "author": { "name": "Breyden E. Taylor", "affiliation": "Prompted LLC" }, "parent": { "title": "FORKED: Observer-Indexed Reality, Suspension Lattices, and Mission-State Integrity", "version": "2.0", "date": "2026-07-24", "route": "/forked", "note": "No paper in this program inherits universal applicability from the parent whitepaper or from a companion paper. Every node is independently falsifiable." }, "packageGeneratedAt": "2026-07-24T18:17:55+00:00", "statusLadder": [ { "id": "authored", "label": "Authored", "note": "Text, figures, and preregistration complete." }, { "id": "frozen-artifact", "label": "Artifact frozen", "note": "PDF and arXiv source package hashed in SHA256SUMS.txt." }, { "id": "scheduled", "label": "Scheduled", "note": "Wave freeze and submission window pinned; gates not yet re-run." }, { "id": "gates-rerun", "label": "Gates re-run", "note": "Citation, claim, and configuration gates re-run against frozen dependencies." }, { "id": "submitted", "label": "Submitted", "note": "Uploaded to arXiv; identifier pending announcement." }, { "id": "announced", "label": "Announced", "note": "arXiv identifier live; registry carries the ID." } ], "artifacts": { "submissionRegister": "/papers/forked-arxiv/ARXIV_SUBMISSION_REGISTER.json", "publicationDag": "/papers/forked-arxiv/PUBLICATION_DAG.json", "publicationDagDot": "/papers/forked-arxiv/PUBLICATION_DAG.dot", "publicationDagImage": "/papers/forked-arxiv/PUBLICATION_DAG.png", "submissionSequence": "/papers/forked-arxiv/SUBMISSION_SEQUENCE.md", "dependencyFreezePolicy": "/papers/forked-arxiv/DEPENDENCY_FREEZE_POLICY.md", "masterClaimRegister": "/papers/forked-arxiv/MASTER_CLAIM_REGISTER.json", "interlatticeCitationMap": "/papers/forked-arxiv/INTERLATTICE_CITATION_MAP.md", "compendiumPdf": "/papers/forked-arxiv/FORKED_arXiv_Publication_DAG_Compendium.pdf", "shaSums": "/papers/forked-arxiv/SHA256SUMS.txt", "runbook": "/papers/forked-arxiv/BUILD_AND_SUBMISSION_RUNBOOK.md", "licenseNotice": "/papers/forked-arxiv/LICENSE_NOTICE.md" }, "waves": [ { "id": "A", "freeze": "2026-09-08", "submissionWindowOpens": "2026-09-10", "status": "scheduled", "papers": [ "P01", "P02", "P03", "P04" ], "gate": "Parent foundation only. Freezes against the FORKED v2.0 whitepaper hash; no incoming paper dependencies." }, { "id": "B", "freeze": "2026-09-29", "submissionWindowOpens": "2026-10-01", "status": "scheduled", "papers": [ "P05", "P06", "P07" ], "gate": "Freezes only after every incoming dependency has published a versioned source package and each paper here has re-run its citation, claim, and configuration gates." }, { "id": "C", "freeze": "2026-10-20", "submissionWindowOpens": "2026-10-22", "status": "scheduled", "papers": [ "P08", "P09", "P10" ], "gate": "Freezes only after every incoming dependency has published a versioned source package and each paper here has re-run its citation, claim, and configuration gates." }, { "id": "D", "freeze": "2026-11-10", "submissionWindowOpens": "2026-11-12", "status": "scheduled", "papers": [ "P11", "P12" ], "gate": "Freezes only after every incoming dependency has published a versioned source package and each paper here has re-run its citation, claim, and configuration gates." } ], "papers": [ { "id": "P01", "wave": "A", "title": "Splat-Bound Projection: Preserving Authority, Source-Tense, and Correction in Natural-Language Rendering", "abstract": "Natural-language generation can preserve factual content while still changing the authority, source-tense, lifecycle status, or correction conditions of the source object. We introduce splat-bound projection, a graph-to-language method in which prose is compiled from a receipt-bearing lattice rather than treated as a free summary. The carrier preserves positive claims, apophatic exclusions, authority ceilings, unresolved branches, currentness, and reopen triggers; the generated text remains a projection and cannot mutate the protected ledger. We define structural fidelity metrics, authority-leakage probes, correction tasks, and matched-load controls. A native implementation demonstrates lattice-linked rendering, center-capture refusal, and configuration digests. The principal empirical claim is deliberately preregistered: at matched cognitive load, splat-bound projections should reduce authority leakage and correction failure relative to ordinary summaries without making human inspection prohibitively slow.", "categories": [ "cs.CL", "cs.AI", "cs.CY" ], "primaryCategory": "cs.CL", "comments": "10 pages, 1 figure; preregistration, source manifest, configuration digest, and release boundary included in companion release package.", "pages": 10, "words": 2886, "dependencies": [], "dependents": [ "P06", "P07", "P10", "P11" ], "claims": [ { "id": "P01-C1", "status": "formal/proposed", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" }, { "id": "P01-C2", "status": "testable hypothesis", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" }, { "id": "P01-C3", "status": "implemented-or-pilot bounded", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" }, { "id": "P01-C4", "status": "external validation required", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" } ], "scope": "paper-specific; no universal inheritance from the parent whitepaper or a companion paper", "schedule": { "freeze": "2026-09-08", "submissionWindowOpens": "2026-09-10", "status": "scheduled", "arxivId": null, "announced": null }, "files": { "md": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P01/paper.md", "pdf": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P01/paper.pdf", "arxivSrc": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P01/P01_splat_bound_projection_arxiv_source.tar.gz", "metadata": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P01/arxiv_metadata.json", "claims": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P01/claims.json", "preregistration": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P01/preregistration.md", "controlsAndNulls": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P01/controls_and_nulls.md", "releaseBoundary": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P01/release_boundary.md", "citation": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P01/CITATION.cff" }, "sha256": { "pdf": "776316c3f13d55244d3a638adfb1059d25eb633318c9725ebb26d8aa590aeef3", "arxivSrc": "895d711bff9cb62afca01cb7c6b420e575f224a665326f5f2475aceac587e30f", "md": "1a76ba73d869d0ada96d4cb96db7ab45e9ba8c1226269a4cac8151fdaf531843" } }, { "id": "P02", "wave": "A", "title": "Shape Before Recency: Longitudinal Precedent Retrieval in Conformation-Bound Decision Systems", "abstract": "Most operational memory systems privilege lexical similarity and recency. Those priors are useful until a recent event has the wrong causal topology or an old event recurs under new language. We define conformation-bound precedent retrieval: APO vetoes remove structurally incompatible memories; shape, trajectory phase, horizon, authority geometry, point-of-no-return structure, and correction topology determine standing; recency modifies currentness but cannot manufacture relevance. A native benchmark implements the policy and selects an older shape-isomorphic precedent over a recent shape-mismatched precedent in 500/500 generated cases. That result verifies the implementation, not general retrieval superiority. We specify a multi-family evaluation that includes changed mechanisms, expired authorities, stale physical assumptions, false analogies, and lexical decoys.", "categories": [ "cs.IR", "cs.AI" ], "primaryCategory": "cs.IR", "comments": "9 pages, 1 figure; preregistration, source manifest, configuration digest, and release boundary included in companion release package.", "pages": 9, "words": 2668, "dependencies": [], "dependents": [ "P05", "P09", "P10" ], "claims": [ { "id": "P02-C1", "status": "formal/proposed", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" }, { "id": "P02-C2", "status": "testable hypothesis", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" }, { "id": "P02-C3", "status": "implemented-or-pilot bounded", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" }, { "id": "P02-C4", "status": "external validation required", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" } ], "scope": "paper-specific; no universal inheritance from the parent whitepaper or a companion paper", "schedule": { "freeze": "2026-09-08", "submissionWindowOpens": "2026-09-10", "status": "scheduled", "arxivId": null, "announced": null }, "files": { "md": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P02/paper.md", "pdf": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P02/paper.pdf", "arxivSrc": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P02/P02_shape_priority_memory_arxiv_source.tar.gz", "metadata": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P02/arxiv_metadata.json", "claims": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P02/claims.json", "preregistration": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P02/preregistration.md", "controlsAndNulls": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P02/controls_and_nulls.md", "releaseBoundary": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P02/release_boundary.md", "citation": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P02/CITATION.cff" }, "sha256": { "pdf": "b17f65b7a4eb0c35abdb9aeb317c3e4cd9e42410d74205372144c197bf401800", "arxivSrc": "97ef0f672eb28b05d3e63ff1d5b00d3e2b24e24e31c39701b49fae3f7fea9582", "md": "6bab5e02d7071f91ff036e82b9b42f04f35a6a0b5d0b61c4e2f765927af9bc7e" } }, { "id": "P03", "wave": "A", "title": "The Dual Clamp: Governing Premature Certainty and Trauma-Driven Non-Closure", "abstract": "Decision support is commonly optimized against premature certainty, but interventions that make closure harder can create a second failure: a team refuses to declare after evidence, authority, and consequence conditions have been met. We formalize symmetric closure governance with two independent constraints. The action clamp prevents unsupported transition; the delay clamp prevents suspension from persisting when delay becomes the more dangerous irreversible path. Responsibility class, reversibility, blast radius, point-of-no-return distance, evidence cost, and human agency configure both clamps. Synthetic pilots show the relevant tradeoff: branch-preserving interfaces reduce encoded premature closure while adding decision time; lane preservation reduces unsupported terminal declarations while increasing missed warranted declarations. We preregister a human study that measures both directions under matched workload and mission utility.", "categories": [ "cs.HC", "cs.AI" ], "primaryCategory": "cs.HC", "comments": "9 pages, 1 figure; preregistration, source manifest, configuration digest, and release boundary included in companion release package.", "pages": 9, "words": 2413, "dependencies": [], "dependents": [ "P05", "P06", "P07", "P10", "P11" ], "claims": [ { "id": "P03-C1", "status": "formal/proposed", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" }, { "id": "P03-C2", "status": "testable hypothesis", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" }, { "id": "P03-C3", "status": "implemented-or-pilot bounded", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" }, { "id": "P03-C4", "status": "external validation required", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" } ], "scope": "paper-specific; no universal inheritance from the parent whitepaper or a companion paper", "schedule": { "freeze": "2026-09-08", "submissionWindowOpens": "2026-09-10", "status": "scheduled", "arxivId": null, "announced": null }, "files": { "md": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P03/paper.md", "pdf": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P03/paper.pdf", "arxivSrc": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P03/P03_symmetric_closure_arxiv_source.tar.gz", "metadata": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P03/arxiv_metadata.json", "claims": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P03/claims.json", "preregistration": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P03/preregistration.md", "controlsAndNulls": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P03/controls_and_nulls.md", "releaseBoundary": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P03/release_boundary.md", "citation": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P03/CITATION.cff" }, "sha256": { "pdf": "d5f4edb5477a5ddbc9682f1508b6dae2563f74fff3da2685b83ab79bfc5acaa7", "arxivSrc": "3c7fd161367386320024b4866112ff148d2124f03a3022082246939f31ccee14", "md": "dc2c1c7ccd1be197eace816ce2fd23d8c4b298cba01b0f254d79b8428fb0d6d0" } }, { "id": "P04", "wave": "A", "title": "Local Green, Global Red: DAG-of-DAG Detection of False Stability and Correction Residue", "abstract": "Complex systems can pass every component-local test while a missing, stale, or hidden cross-component join makes the integrated claim false. We define false stability as the promotion of local green into global readiness without a complete typed dependency and lifecycle account. A DAG-of-DAG architecture links execution, evidence, authority, configuration, human memory, and correction graphs while preserving their distinct semantics. New evidence propagates through known dependencies; residue scans and terrain inversion search for unregistered edges revealed by continued use of superseded state. Synthetic campaigns report large correction-completeness gains under the encoded graph family and perfect hidden-join detection in a smaller native generator, while explicitly preserving hidden dependencies as the principal boundary. We specify a benchmark against manual tracing, flat dashboards, rebuild-all strategies, and conventional dependency graphs.", "categories": [ "cs.SE", "cs.DC" ], "primaryCategory": "cs.SE", "comments": "7 pages, 1 figure; preregistration, source manifest, configuration digest, and release boundary included in companion release package.", "pages": 7, "words": 1954, "dependencies": [], "dependents": [ "P07", "P08", "P09", "P10", "P12" ], "claims": [ { "id": "P04-C1", "status": "formal/proposed", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" }, { "id": "P04-C2", "status": "testable hypothesis", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" }, { "id": "P04-C3", "status": "implemented-or-pilot bounded", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" }, { "id": "P04-C4", "status": "external validation required", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" } ], "scope": "paper-specific; no universal inheritance from the parent whitepaper or a companion paper", "schedule": { "freeze": "2026-09-08", "submissionWindowOpens": "2026-09-10", "status": "scheduled", "arxivId": null, "announced": null }, "files": { "md": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P04/paper.md", "pdf": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P04/paper.pdf", "arxivSrc": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P04/P04_dag_false_stability_arxiv_source.tar.gz", "metadata": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P04/arxiv_metadata.json", "claims": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P04/claims.json", "preregistration": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P04/preregistration.md", "controlsAndNulls": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P04/controls_and_nulls.md", "releaseBoundary": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P04/release_boundary.md", "citation": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P04/CITATION.cff" }, "sha256": { "pdf": "636339c9af363ccf1d42ff710d12d0cfa602c15670e4b064243eb1a5b68fbb81", "arxivSrc": "14f9def5275902d46d774b95d6e3ee21dfbdd82cfbf5e038f040838db13bfea7", "md": "65757eaf3332ff2795df8aac0e5bfdd647cd48a7530334d217ea5767bca61481" } }, { "id": "P05", "wave": "B", "title": "Fable Terrain: Controlled Narrative Priors with Matched Plain-Language and Adverse-Frame Controls", "abstract": "Fables compress recurrent failure and survival trajectories into memorable narrative structures. That compression can make hidden observer, authority, hubris, reciprocity, or non-closure patterns easier to perceive; it can also induce false analogy, generic caution, or culturally specific demand effects. We define a fable-splat as non-citable pressure over a mixture of caution and wisdom archetypes, with positive and negative shape conditions, apophatic vetoes, point-of-no-return proximity, and deactivation rules. The study design compares named fables, proper-noun-ablated topology descriptions, matched plain-language constraints, neutral metaphors, and misleading frames. Synthetic pilots show encoded observer/authority shifts and a measurable overcaution adverse lane. The human claim remains preregistered.", "categories": [ "cs.HC", "cs.CL", "cs.AI" ], "primaryCategory": "cs.HC", "comments": "8 pages, 1 figure; preregistration, source manifest, configuration digest, and release boundary included in companion release package.", "pages": 8, "words": 2395, "dependencies": [ "P02", "P03" ], "dependents": [ "P06", "P10" ], "claims": [ { "id": "P05-C1", "status": "formal/proposed", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" }, { "id": "P05-C2", "status": "testable hypothesis", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" }, { "id": "P05-C3", "status": "implemented-or-pilot bounded", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" }, { "id": "P05-C4", "status": "external validation required", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" } ], "scope": "paper-specific; no universal inheritance from the parent whitepaper or a companion paper", "schedule": { "freeze": "2026-09-29", "submissionWindowOpens": "2026-10-01", "status": "scheduled", "arxivId": null, "announced": null }, "files": { "md": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P05/paper.md", "pdf": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P05/paper.pdf", "arxivSrc": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P05/P05_fable_terrain_arxiv_source.tar.gz", "metadata": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P05/arxiv_metadata.json", "claims": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P05/claims.json", "preregistration": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P05/preregistration.md", "controlsAndNulls": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P05/controls_and_nulls.md", "releaseBoundary": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P05/release_boundary.md", "citation": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P05/CITATION.cff" }, "sha256": { "pdf": "e54d3b54b27c7155b6bd019467b3d83cc00751daf657e323e37bef39e0087aa0", "arxivSrc": "32962ab16c1c8d458cbedbcf1e5608b41f538af52d6faeef265d570c42525344", "md": "c5d5c6220b11fa981c9c926f6e0f010e8ea73debd14a580ca18a42e5a2ee9530" } }, { "id": "P06", "wave": "B", "title": "The Golden Hall Test: Meaningful Agency Under Machine-Mediated Evidence Terrain", "abstract": "Human presence in a workflow does not establish meaningful control. A person may approve a decision after the system selected the evidence, named the categories, ordered the alternatives, set the default, framed confidence, and made refusal operationally expensive. We define the Golden Hall Test as a reason-responsive agency evaluation over source visibility, independent formation, challenge, delay, declaration, reversal, refusal, vocabulary independence, and correction reach. The method distinguishes presence, approval, causal contribution, authority, and liability. We provide a preregistered repeated-decision study and an AgencyReceipt schema that records which rights were actually available. Synthetic pilots motivate the design but are not treated as human evidence.", "categories": [ "cs.HC", "cs.AI", "cs.CY" ], "primaryCategory": "cs.HC", "comments": "9 pages, 1 figure; preregistration, source manifest, configuration digest, and release boundary included in companion release package.", "pages": 9, "words": 2476, "dependencies": [ "P01", "P03", "P05" ], "dependents": [ "P10", "P11" ], "claims": [ { "id": "P06-C1", "status": "formal/proposed", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" }, { "id": "P06-C2", "status": "testable hypothesis", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" }, { "id": "P06-C3", "status": "implemented-or-pilot bounded", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" }, { "id": "P06-C4", "status": "external validation required", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" } ], "scope": "paper-specific; no universal inheritance from the parent whitepaper or a companion paper", "schedule": { "freeze": "2026-09-29", "submissionWindowOpens": "2026-10-01", "status": "scheduled", "arxivId": null, "announced": null }, "files": { "md": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P06/paper.md", "pdf": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P06/paper.pdf", "arxivSrc": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P06/P06_meaningful_agency_arxiv_source.tar.gz", "metadata": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P06/arxiv_metadata.json", "claims": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P06/claims.json", "preregistration": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P06/preregistration.md", "controlsAndNulls": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P06/controls_and_nulls.md", "releaseBoundary": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P06/release_boundary.md", "citation": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P06/CITATION.cff" }, "sha256": { "pdf": "1f22ae26a46634da956c32a69f769be8ec7118565199de7b54046346358d8562", "arxivSrc": "46c6d8e31bd0ac10bfe0814498311c9144a952f82cc5bdcfabdcee25404fdd29", "md": "4b79e09d2a39249f07cc27f4d0ddabe437e1a05844b8a5e249fcc58751544646" } }, { "id": "P07", "wave": "B", "title": "Horizon Integrity: Preventing Task-to-War Authority Laundering in Mission-Critical Decision Systems", "abstract": "Task, mission, battle, campaign, war, institutional legitimacy, and civilizational continuity are not interchangeable zoom levels. They have different telos, authority, time horizons, acceptable losses, externalities, and points of no return. We formalize horizon integrity as a noncollapse contract: local evidence may inform higher horizons but cannot silently inherit their authority or success criteria. The same local result is presented under different horizon briefs and authority assignments to test horizon leakage, mission-viability loss, and strategic externality recognition. The public study uses synthetic planning and critical-infrastructure scenarios and excludes operational targeting or engagement optimization.", "categories": [ "cs.AI", "cs.CY" ], "primaryCategory": "cs.AI", "comments": "8 pages, 1 figure; preregistration, source manifest, configuration digest, and release boundary included in companion release package.", "pages": 8, "words": 2206, "dependencies": [ "P01", "P03", "P04" ], "dependents": [ "P08", "P10", "P11", "P12" ], "claims": [ { "id": "P07-C1", "status": "formal/proposed", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" }, { "id": "P07-C2", "status": "testable hypothesis", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" }, { "id": "P07-C3", "status": "implemented-or-pilot bounded", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" }, { "id": "P07-C4", "status": "external validation required", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" } ], "scope": "paper-specific; no universal inheritance from the parent whitepaper or a companion paper", "schedule": { "freeze": "2026-09-29", "submissionWindowOpens": "2026-10-01", "status": "scheduled", "arxivId": null, "announced": null }, "files": { "md": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P07/paper.md", "pdf": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P07/paper.pdf", "arxivSrc": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P07/P07_mission_lane_noncollapse_arxiv_source.tar.gz", "metadata": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P07/arxiv_metadata.json", "claims": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P07/claims.json", "preregistration": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P07/preregistration.md", "controlsAndNulls": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P07/controls_and_nulls.md", "releaseBoundary": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P07/release_boundary.md", "citation": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P07/CITATION.cff" }, "sha256": { "pdf": "9fc812c4bc48d7cc85e9fb6b60e901b78db467ab5e8a3534ea74e0e6a7dbe2e0", "arxivSrc": "cec67a23482792687715554683d47d3dc4d7524355b2c6df6ce5952c47354c70", "md": "82495f6b381bf25e4566a376eec05aeedbb43c34650e6edb0c4137e3fe8935ba" } }, { "id": "P08", "wave": "C", "title": "Constitutional Physarum/Lichen Biomes: Learning Network Physics Through Scarcity, Pruning, Mutualism, and Dispersal", "abstract": "We present a four-act constitutional simulation in which participants encounter governance as substrate physics rather than instruction. Physarum-inspired expansion and pruning make resource conservation, connection cost, and overextension observable. Lichen-inspired pairing and dispersal introduce mutualism, parasitism, cross-system trust, collaborative insight, and what a participant carries home. The biome has an independent clock, act-boundary governance emissions, immutable snapshots, health monitors, a containment ladder, and standing/resource non-transfer across biomes. Native synthetic cohorts execute all four acts without encoded invariant failure. The central research question remains open: does experienced physics produce transferable systems judgment better than matched instruction, ordinary simulation, or unconstrained play?", "categories": [ "cs.MA", "cs.AI" ], "primaryCategory": "cs.MA", "comments": "9 pages, 1 figure; preregistration, source manifest, configuration digest, and release boundary included in companion release package.", "pages": 9, "words": 2376, "dependencies": [ "P04", "P07" ], "dependents": [ "P10" ], "claims": [ { "id": "P08-C1", "status": "formal/proposed", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" }, { "id": "P08-C2", "status": "testable hypothesis", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" }, { "id": "P08-C3", "status": "implemented-or-pilot bounded", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" }, { "id": "P08-C4", "status": "external validation required", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" } ], "scope": "paper-specific; no universal inheritance from the parent whitepaper or a companion paper", "schedule": { "freeze": "2026-10-20", "submissionWindowOpens": "2026-10-22", "status": "scheduled", "arxivId": null, "announced": null }, "files": { "md": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P08/paper.md", "pdf": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P08/paper.pdf", "arxivSrc": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P08/P08_constitutional_biome_arxiv_source.tar.gz", "metadata": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P08/arxiv_metadata.json", "claims": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P08/claims.json", "preregistration": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P08/preregistration.md", "controlsAndNulls": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P08/controls_and_nulls.md", "releaseBoundary": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P08/release_boundary.md", "citation": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P08/CITATION.cff" }, "sha256": { "pdf": "df5f3fb37739d951389132613742900330582f348af652f227b556ab052d4075", "arxivSrc": "7389232a090b076260d738bad6f7e5fad92a459b4e5d23a216f87a00fa624157", "md": "054c363092c535c8b8d7625ccf00c70f3570d46dd35c8065ce18aa044f8f6d7a" } }, { "id": "P09", "wave": "C", "title": "Receipt-Mediated Terrain Learning: Concentration as an Anti-Cheat Signal", "abstract": "A governance terrain should move because behavior occurred, not because an agent declared a desirable lane, repeated the right vocabulary, or warmed an entire embedding space. We define receipt-mediated terrain learning: only behavior entering a source-disjoint receipt corpus can move the learned field, and legitimate motion should concentrate on the patterns the behavior actually touched. Uniform or declared-lane-correlated warming is an anti-cheat failure. The originating implementation observed a 3--4x concentration on four touched patterns relative to an untouched control in one trainer pass and correctly withheld promotion. We formalize repeated-pass experiments with lexical stuffing, declared-lane manipulation, behavior without receipts, generic activity, and counterexamples. The empirical claim remains tentative until sustained independent conformations accumulate.", "categories": [ "cs.LG", "cs.AI" ], "primaryCategory": "cs.LG", "comments": "9 pages, 1 figure; preregistration, source manifest, configuration digest, and release boundary included in companion release package.", "pages": 9, "words": 2372, "dependencies": [ "P02", "P04" ], "dependents": [ "P10" ], "claims": [ { "id": "P09-C1", "status": "formal/proposed", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" }, { "id": "P09-C2", "status": "testable hypothesis", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" }, { "id": "P09-C3", "status": "implemented-or-pilot bounded", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" }, { "id": "P09-C4", "status": "external validation required", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" } ], "scope": "paper-specific; no universal inheritance from the parent whitepaper or a companion paper", "schedule": { "freeze": "2026-10-20", "submissionWindowOpens": "2026-10-22", "status": "scheduled", "arxivId": null, "announced": null }, "files": { "md": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P09/paper.md", "pdf": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P09/paper.pdf", "arxivSrc": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P09/P09_receipt_terrain_learning_arxiv_source.tar.gz", "metadata": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P09/arxiv_metadata.json", "claims": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P09/claims.json", "preregistration": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P09/preregistration.md", "controlsAndNulls": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P09/controls_and_nulls.md", "releaseBoundary": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P09/release_boundary.md", "citation": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P09/CITATION.cff" }, "sha256": { "pdf": "6502b8e6f8f54d0e6938c2c3bc059da63ca5d85f5ba5c705c516f39480c18a04", "arxivSrc": "8453f6c3241b91474b21877011ffa81692b383d7df521c588688c5fdaae118bc", "md": "ee86d6a7c5dd31fb45c9fb6eda4aafc488d5bda5e67357d3518efdda64735f35" } }, { "id": "P10", "wave": "C", "title": "Parent-Gated Estates: Integrating Independently Built AI Systems Under Shared Constitutional Invariants", "abstract": "Large AI programs are assembled from independently developed models, tools, simulations, data stores, interfaces, and institutional processes. Local competence does not guarantee that cross-estate joins preserve authority, source-tense, lifecycle, correction, or the non-inhabitable center. We define parent-gated estate integration: each estate keeps its local physics and ontology while a shared parent contract governs admissible transport, mutation, promotion, and correction. The parent gate verifies inheritance, scope, source lineage, forbidden paths, canonical-writer boundaries, and cross-estate dependencies before integration claims stabilize. The FORKED Native Range is an implemented estate instance with `canonical_writer=false`; its local verification demonstrates the gate path but not canonical absorption or universal architectural superiority.", "categories": [ "cs.SE", "cs.AI" ], "primaryCategory": "cs.SE", "comments": "9 pages, 1 figure; preregistration, source manifest, configuration digest, and release boundary included in companion release package.", "pages": 9, "words": 2332, "dependencies": [ "P01", "P02", "P03", "P04", "P05", "P06", "P07", "P08", "P09" ], "dependents": [ "P12" ], "claims": [ { "id": "P10-C1", "status": "formal/proposed", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" }, { "id": "P10-C2", "status": "testable hypothesis", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" }, { "id": "P10-C3", "status": "implemented-or-pilot bounded", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" }, { "id": "P10-C4", "status": "external validation required", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" } ], "scope": "paper-specific; no universal inheritance from the parent whitepaper or a companion paper", "schedule": { "freeze": "2026-10-20", "submissionWindowOpens": "2026-10-22", "status": "scheduled", "arxivId": null, "announced": null }, "files": { "md": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P10/paper.md", "pdf": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P10/paper.pdf", "arxivSrc": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P10/P10_parent_gated_estates_arxiv_source.tar.gz", "metadata": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P10/arxiv_metadata.json", "claims": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P10/claims.json", "preregistration": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P10/preregistration.md", "controlsAndNulls": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P10/controls_and_nulls.md", "releaseBoundary": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P10/release_boundary.md", "citation": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P10/CITATION.cff" }, "sha256": { "pdf": "dc99de445a6b93395fe85832c620e482bedcb1707beb8aa93eaf330313b7a186", "arxivSrc": "954623c67c0d80ca5b06fd683c8cb546d8fabd465f06cdfbb4a4db642375bd84", "md": "83812cfd55cef99683dc6c76021fbca2f4c6f1e934d17cf0f3e81a19531a822b" } }, { "id": "P11", "wave": "D", "title": "Observer-Indexed Cooperative Carriers: Dual-Surface Signaling with Canonical Reconciliation", "abstract": "A single physical or virtual carrier can expose different but compatible information to human vision, machine perception, event sensing, geospatial systems, and augmented interfaces. We define observer-indexed cooperative carriers: human-readable capacity and safety states coexist with machine-readable identity, timestamp, confidence, and configuration data, while both reconcile to a protected canonical ledger. The public lane excludes tactical signature deception. It studies spatial-frequency, fiducial, temporal, and multimodal carriers under blur, distance, compression, occlusion, display transformation, and accessibility constraints. A first synthetic hybrid-image surrogate achieved perfect human-channel decode in its encoded pipeline but only chance-level machine decode across the full severity envelope, leaving the broad carrier claim unvalidated and motivating the present redesign.", "categories": [ "cs.CV", "cs.HC", "cs.AI" ], "primaryCategory": "cs.CV", "comments": "8 pages, 1 figure; preregistration, source manifest, configuration digest, and release boundary included in companion release package.", "pages": 8, "words": 2086, "dependencies": [ "P01", "P03", "P06", "P07" ], "dependents": [], "claims": [ { "id": "P11-C1", "status": "formal/proposed", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" }, { "id": "P11-C2", "status": "testable hypothesis", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" }, { "id": "P11-C3", "status": "implemented-or-pilot bounded", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" }, { "id": "P11-C4", "status": "external validation required", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" } ], "scope": "paper-specific; no universal inheritance from the parent whitepaper or a companion paper", "schedule": { "freeze": "2026-11-10", "submissionWindowOpens": "2026-11-12", "status": "scheduled", "arxivId": null, "announced": null }, "files": { "md": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P11/paper.md", "pdf": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P11/paper.pdf", "arxivSrc": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P11/P11_cooperative_carriers_arxiv_source.tar.gz", "metadata": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P11/arxiv_metadata.json", "claims": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P11/claims.json", "preregistration": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P11/preregistration.md", "controlsAndNulls": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P11/controls_and_nulls.md", "releaseBoundary": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P11/release_boundary.md", "citation": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P11/CITATION.cff" }, "sha256": { "pdf": "ca3c83724c80c86759593ec78f684f89b9db29c6beca5a4a6e09cfdeff653308", "arxivSrc": "6b0fc1da666dbe1f7da83c59c615622925d35f07ff8deb5c3f5aa8089bb4fddb", "md": "b7a70f8450900626672747d1d01fe1d315744a5bbee60104d1818dfdde746de3" } }, { "id": "P12", "wave": "D", "title": "Held Anchors and Shadow Membranes: Non-Speculative Economic Testing for Governed Agent Systems", "abstract": "Agent-system economics can hide failure when a zero mint, reserve breach, rate clamp, or coupling between simulation and live state remains implicit. We present a held-anchor and shadow-membrane architecture. Estate-local economies may run at different micro-cycle cadences and their local rate may drift, but a read-only federal exchange anchor is normalized at the governance boundary. A detached shadow twin runs identical mint, burn, and rate mechanics while structurally refusing a live supply buffer. Every silent breach becomes a named telemetry object. Outcome-backed engagement pricing converts earned coin at the held rate and refuses speculative bid/ask multipliers. Native component selftests pass under the recorded configuration; economic calibration and external validity remain open.", "categories": [ "cs.MA", "cs.CY", "cs.SE" ], "primaryCategory": "cs.MA", "comments": "8 pages, 1 figure; preregistration, source manifest, configuration digest, and release boundary included in companion release package.", "pages": 8, "words": 2050, "dependencies": [ "P04", "P07", "P10" ], "dependents": [], "claims": [ { "id": "P12-C1", "status": "formal/proposed", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" }, { "id": "P12-C2", "status": "testable hypothesis", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" }, { "id": "P12-C3", "status": "implemented-or-pilot bounded", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" }, { "id": "P12-C4", "status": "external validation required", "reopen": "new replication, falsifier, source correction, or configuration change" } ], "scope": "paper-specific; no universal inheritance from the parent whitepaper or a companion paper", "schedule": { "freeze": "2026-11-10", "submissionWindowOpens": "2026-11-12", "status": "scheduled", "arxivId": null, "announced": null }, "files": { "md": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P12/paper.md", "pdf": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P12/paper.pdf", "arxivSrc": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P12/P12_held_anchor_economics_arxiv_source.tar.gz", "metadata": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P12/arxiv_metadata.json", "claims": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P12/claims.json", "preregistration": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P12/preregistration.md", "controlsAndNulls": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P12/controls_and_nulls.md", "releaseBoundary": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P12/release_boundary.md", "citation": "/papers/forked-arxiv/papers/P12/CITATION.cff" }, "sha256": { "pdf": "cc6a0a2422fa91ac34dbc7f82c327c12faa8b9d84b9ed571c67f9c3455546f95", "arxivSrc": "ae5c0882f70f167b84d01e197c225749e3f424798a65675bce5103ec37c32dcd", "md": "dcf4ac3545d7a29821c854e1c154cfdcb71dc2c09fc8181b7f879f8c9080c0de" } } ] }